Antibiotic Residues in Aquaculture

            

FAO

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations. It was founded on 16 October 1945 in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. In 1951 its headquarters were moved from Washington, D.C., United States, to Rome, Italy. The FAO has 190 members (189 states and the European Community). It leads international efforts to defeat hunger. Its Latin motto, “fiat panis”, translates into English as "let there be bread!".
Serving both developed and developing countries, FAO acts as a neutral forum where all nations meet as equals to negotiate agreements and debate policy. FAO is also a source of knowledge and information, and helps developing countries and countries in transition modernize and improve agriculture, forestry and fisheries practices, ensuring good nutrition and food security for all.

Summary / Synopsis

Antibiotic Residues in Aquaculture products : the Issue

[FAO, 01/01/2002]

Salmon Farming

[Greenpeace, 01/11/2007]

How long can we keep fishing to feed fish?

[New Scientist, 02/10/2004]

Farming Fish: The Aquaculture Boom

[The World Resources Institute, Chroniques de l'ONU, 01/07/2001]

---

Antibiotic Residues in Aquaculture products : the Issue

31/08/2008 2:45 pm

Background
As in other animal production sectors, antibiotics are used in aquaculture 
during both production and processing, mainly to prevent (prophylactic use) 
and treat (therapeutic use) bacterial diseases.(1) Antibiotics have also been 
recommended and used as disinfectants in fish handling, but this practice has 
proved to be ineffective and is generally not approved by the fish inspection services. 
Antibiotics have not always been used in a responsible manner in aquaculture and, in
 a number of reported situations, control of the use of antibiotics has not provided a
 proper assurance of the prevention of risks to humans. FAO, the World Health Organization
 (WHO), the International Office of Epizootics (OIE) and a number of national governments 
have already raised the issue of irresponsible use of antibiotics in all production sectors,
 with particular concern for the potential risks to public health. Many governments around
 the world have introduced, changed or tightened national regulations on the use of antibiotics,
 in general and within the aquaculture sector.
Public health concerns
When consumed directly by humans as medicine, antibiotics may cause adverse side-effects,
 but these can generally be avoided through adhering to the recommended dose and duration 
 of therapy. However, when antibiotics are unintentionally ingested as residues in food, the 
amount ingested cannot be quantified or monitored and may cause direct health concerns, 
such as aplastic anaemia, which is said to be associated with chloramphenicol. These direct
 effects pose significant risks to human health. In addition, the unintentional consumption of 
antibiotics is leading to the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria that are pathogenic to
 humans, and this is another important problem that has not yet received adequate attention. The 
development of antibiotic resistance by pathogenic bacteria is considered to be one of the most
 serious risks to human health at the global level.(2) The problem arises when bacteria acquire 
resistance to one or more of the antibiotics to which they were formerly susceptible, and when
 that resistance eventually makes the antibiotics ineffective in treating specific microbial diseases
 in humans.(3) Recognition of the risks associated with the direct and indirect effects on human 
health of both active and passive consumption of antibiotics has led to bans on the use of certain 
antibiotics in animal food production (particularly those antibiotics for which no safe residue levels 
can be determined) and to the establishment of maximum residue limits (MRLs) for those
 with known risks.
Effects on the industry
During the last year, the detection of chloramphenicol in internationally traded shrimp
 products has caused much concern. The substance has been found in cultured products, 
resulting in a slowdown in imports, causing economic loss among the concerned producers
 and reflecting negatively on all shrimps and on aquaculture overall.
(1) See, for instance: FAO/SEAFDEC/CIDA. 2000. Use of chemicals in aquaculture in Asia,
 edited by J.R. Arthur, C.R. Lavilla-Pitogo and R.P. Subasinghe. Proceedings of the Meeting on
 the Use of Chemicals in Aquaculture in Asia, Iloilo, the Philippines, 20-22 May 1996. 235 pp.; 
and FAO. 1997. Towards safe and effective use of chemicals in coastal aquaculture. Reports
 and Studies, GESAMP No. 65. Rome. 40 pp.
(2) Updated information on the development of microbial resistance can be found at: 
www.fda.gov/oc/opacom/hottopics/anti_resist.html. See also: K.M. Cahill, J.A. 
Davies and R. Johnson. 1966. Report on an epidemic due to Shigella dysenteriae, type 1,
 in the Somali interior. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 15: 52-56.
(3) P. Shears. 2001. Antibiotic resistance in the tropics. Transactions of the Royal Society 
of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 95: 127-130. F. Angulo and P.M. Griffin. 2000. Changes 
in antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. Emerging Infectious
 Diseases, 6(4); and USFDA. 1997. Extralabel animal drug use; fluoroquinolones and 
glycopeptides; order of prohibition. Federal Register, 62(99): 27 944-27 947.

[Taken from « The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture » report,
FAO, 2002]

| Legal notice | News feed